Date: 30/05/2019 | Corporate & Commercial, Business & Professional Services
Many of our clients are directors and shareholders of their companies and are paid using a mixture of a fixed salary and dividend payments. Sometimes these dividends are paid annually when the accounts for each year are finalised but more often than not, they are paid on a periodic basis and classified as interim dividends. In addition, many clients want to pay dividends of different amounts to shareholders owning the same class of shares in order to reflect their contribution to the business or their financial needs. In both these situations it is easy to fall foul of the rules and end up paying illegal dividends and creating personal liability for shareholders and directors.
So what are the rules? Legally, in order to pay a dividend, a company must first have distributable reserves sufficient to cover that payment as determined by reference to a set of relevant accounts (s830 and 836 Companies Act 2006). If dividends are paid out without there being sufficient distributable reserves, directors can be personally liable to repay those dividends to the Company even if they did not personally receive any cash. Also, shareholders who knew or had reasonable cause to believe the Company did not have distributable reserves can be liable to repay all sums paid to them.
This may sound dull and technical but it is important and it can have a big impact on personal finances.
1. Paying interim dividends
In a recent case, Global Corporate Ltd v Hale  EWCA Civ 2618, Mr Hale, a director and shareholder was paid by way of a small salary and interim dividends. At the end of each financial year his accountant looked at the books and if the Company didn’t have enough distributable reserves to permit the interim dividend payments which had been made, he just reclassified these as salary, reversed the interim dividends and paid the required additional tax. Unfortunately for Mr Hale his company went into liquidation. In fact, there were not sufficient distributable reserves in place to allow the payment of the interim dividends to Mr Hale and the liquidators demanded that he repay these. The Court of Appeal ruled the payments made to him by the Company could not be two things at once, either they were salary, or they were dividends. The records at the point of liquidation showed the payments as interim dividends so given there were not sufficient reserves in place at the payment date the court ruled the dividends were repayable by Mr Hale.
2. Paying different amounts to different shareholders
Mistakes are common here. Often clients forget that each shareholder holding shares of a particular class has the same right to receive dividends and think if they have enough cash to make the desired payment then that’s all that’s legally required. Needless to say, it’s a bit more complicated than that.
So, for example, let’s take John, his wife Mary and their two children Andrew and Fiona each of whom own 25 Ordinary Shares in the family company. The Company wants to pay out £100,000 of profits and wants £70,000 to go to John who works full time in the business and £30,000 to go to Fiona who is buying a new house. Mary and Andrew are to get nothing at this point.
Two mistakes are commonly made when paying out dividends in unequal amounts to shareholders owning the same class of shares.
Firstly, the requirement for those getting no payment (or a reduced payment) to waive their dividend rights is often overlooked. Those shareholders need to sign waiver letters confirming the amount of dividend they wish to waive.
Secondly, the Company has to have sufficient reserves not just to make dividend payments to those it wishes to get the cash but also to cover the dividends that would have been payable to every shareholder, even those that have been waived.
So, using our example, the Company wants to pay John a £70,000 dividend on his 25 shares which is a dividend of £2,800 per share. That means all the other Shareholders are entitled to £2,800 per share also, giving a total payable to shareholders of £280,000. Mary and Andrew can each waive their £70,000 and Fiona can waive £40,000. Even though the company only intends to pay out £100,000 it still needs to have distributable reserves of £280,000 to allow it to make that payment. Payment of the £100,000 without having those reserves would be an illegal dividend.
No director or shareholder wants to find themselves in the position of having to pay back sums to the company, especially if it’s cash that has already been spent or which they never received, so before paying out dividends, clients would be well advised to check not only that they have the cash flow to make the payment but also that they can comply with all the rules.
Keep your organisation up to date with the latest opportunities and changes in commercial law with regular insight and updates from the experts at Davidson Chalmers Stewart.