Date: 08/10/2017 | Business & Professional Services
There were two main changes to the rules on judicial review:
Anecdotal evidence suggests that there is now less delay in progressing judicial review applications, and that judges are increasingly willing to use the powers they were given to refuse permission to proceed with a judicial review.
The three month limit was imposed to provide a bit more certainty. Those that are exposed to the prospect of a judicial review challenging their decision now have much more clarity in that they know that once they pass the three months from when their decision was taken they are likely free from any challenge to it (though there are provisions in the rules for a challenge out with the 3 month period in limited circumstances, as you would expect).
To obtain permission to proceed you need to satisfy the court that (1) you have sufficient interest in the application and (2) that the application for JR has a ‘real prospect of success’. This stage was introduced to weed out the numerous judicial reviews that were lodged, for example in immigration cases, that had no/poor prospects of success.
What the change in the time limit does mean is that you really need to have all of your ducks in a row at the outset of raising a judicial review. Much of the costs and time spent will be front-loaded as everything now needs to be in order at the outset for you to obtain permission from the court to take the case forward. Putting forward your best possible case right from the start is the best way to secure permission, and conversely, when acting in opposition to the challenge, to maximise the chance of permission being refused.
We have had recent success of being granted permission to proceed with a judicial review against strong opposition to that being granted and obtaining that without the need for a hearing.
If you have been affected by a decision/action that is capable of judicial review, effectively what these changes mean is that you must act quickly. We are happy to advise on all aspects of bringing and running judicial reviews so please contact us for any more information – but, as above, please do so without delay!
For further information on judicial review work, contact Sheila Webster or Magnus Miller.
Written by
Latest Updates
Keep your organisation up to date with the latest opportunities and changes in commercial law with regular insight and updates from the experts at Davidson Chalmers Stewart.
A typical law firm? Not really. But a partner for the people and businesses we work with? Absolutely.
Our determination to do things a better way is nothing without our clients. So if you like what you see and think we’d make a good team, let’s talk. Pick up the phone and call us direct or make specific enquiries to our individual email addresses across the website. Alternatively use the form to submit general questions and comments.
Either way, we’ll get the message.
Edinburgh
t0131 625 9191Glasgow
t0141 428 3258Galashiels
t01896 550991Edinburgh
Davidson Chalmers Stewart
12 Hope Street
Edinburgh
EH2 4DB
DX ED408
Galashiels
Davidson Chalmers Stewart
Waverley Chambers
Ladhope Vale
Galashiels
TD1 1BW
Want to get even more insight from Davidson Chalmers Stewart?
Keep your organisation up to date with the latest opportunities and changes in commercial law with regular insight and updates from the experts at Davidson Chalmers Stewart.
Copyright © 2023 Davidson Chalmers Stewart. All Rights Reserved